• Login
    • Join
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Exclusives
    • Manufacturing
    • Markets
    • Top 10 Orthopedic Device Firms
    • Buyers' Guide
    • Events
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Exclusives
  • Manufacturing
  • Markets
  • Top 10 Orthopedic Device Firms
  • Buyers' Guide
  • Events
  • Current & Past Issues
    Features
    Departments
    Columns
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Editorial Guidelines
    eNewsletter Archive
    Top Features
    Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Orthopedic Industry

    Exiting a World of Pain

    Maintaining a Laser Focus

    Top Ten Design Rules for Orthopedic Device Development

    At the End of the Line—Packaging & Sterilization
    Breaking News
    Certifications
    Clinical Trials
    Device Approvals & Patents
    Financial & Deals
    International
    Market Data & Trends
    OEM News
    People
    Product & Service Releases
    Products
    Quality, Recalls & Risk
    Regulatory & Legal
    Supplier & Contract Mfg.
    Live From Shows
    Top News & Features
    A Biodegradable Bone-Fixing Composite Made Partly of Spider Silk

    Advanced Biomedical Technologies Receives Chinese CFDA Approval of Polymer Fixation Screws

    Smith & Nephew’s Expert Connect Center Endorsed by Royal College of Surgeons

    Stradis Healthcare Announces New Medical Device Packaging Division Director

    Oregon Surgical Institute to Implement Zimmer Biomet Signature Solutions Outpatient Program
    3-D Printing/Additive Mfg.
    Assembly & Automation
    Biocompatibility & Testing
    Clean Room
    Coatings/Surface Modification
    Contract Manufacturing
    Design
    Extrusion
    Finishing
    Forging & Casting
    Instruments, Cases & Trays
    International/Offshoring
    Laser Processing
    Materials
    Machining & Tooling
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    Prototyping
    Research & Developement
    Software & Quality
    Staffing, Training & Prof. Dev.
    Supply Chain

    A Biodegradable Bone-Fixing Composite Made Partly of Spider Silk

    Stable Cartilage Tissue Successfully Cultivated from Stem Cells

    Spikes of Graphene Can Kill Bacteria on Knee & Hip Implants

    Spineology Reveals 12-Month Outcomes for Interbody Fusion Clinical Trial

    CoreLink Launches Foundation 3D Printed Titanium Interbody Cages
    Biologics
    Bracing/Prosthetics
    Extremities
    Imaging
    Instruments
    Large Joint
    MIS/Robotics
    Spine/Neurology
    Trauma/Sports
    Top Markets
    Stimulating the Natural Healing Process

    Targeting the Triple Aim

    Clinical Knowledge Key to Advancing Orthobiologics Technologies

    Minor Orthopedic Replacement Implants Global Market Exceeds $1.5 Billion

    Six Advantages of Machined Polymer Components over Metals
    Companies
    Categories
    Company Profiles
    White Papers
    Add New Company
    International Buyers Guide Companies
    Xact Wire EDM Corp.

    Gauthier Biomedical Inc

    Wytech

    Nelipak Healthcare Packaging

    Bihlermed
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    • Magazine
      • Current & Past Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Departments
      • Columns
      • Digital Edition
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Editorial Guidelines
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • Breaking News
    • Buyers' Guide
      • Companies
      • Categories
      • Corporate Capabilities
      • White Papers
      • Add Your Company
    • Manufacturing
      • 3-D Printing/Additive Mfg.
      • Assembly & Automation
      • Biocompatibility & Testing
      • Clean Room
      • Coatings/Surface Modification
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Design
      • Extrusion
      • Finishing
      • Forging & Casting
      • Instruments, Cases & Trays
      • International/Offshoring
      • Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Machining & Tooling
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • Prototyping
      • Research & Developement
      • Software & Quality
      • Staffing, Training & Prof. Dev.
      • Supply Chain
    • Markets
      • Biologics
      • Bracing/Prosthetics
      • Extremities
      • Imaging
      • Instruments
      • Large Joint
      • MIS/Robotics
      • Spine/Neurology
      • Trauma/Sports
    • Top 10 Orthopedic Device Firms
    • Online Exclusives
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
      • Advertise With Us
    Features

    Patent Insight into Knee Replacement Prosthetics

    Established leaders are primarily focused on traditional solutions while newer firms look to customization.

    The ConforMIS iTotal customized total knee replacement. Image courtesy of ConforMIS.
    The ConforMIS iTotal customized total knee replacement. Image courtesy of ConforMIS.
    Related CONTENT
    • Zimmer Biomet's First-Quarter Sales Rise 3.8 Percent
    • DePuy Synthes Awarded U.S. D.O.D. Contract for Orthopedic Products
    • Revised ASTM Standard Will Help Test, Improve Elbow Prostheses
    • Hyalex Orthopaedics Appoints President & CEO; Raises $16M in Financing
    • Zimmer Biomet Recalls Implantable Spinal Fusion Stimulators
    Justin Wen, Intellectual Property Consultant, Global Prior Art10.02.17
    Since their introduction in the 1960s, knee replacement prosthetics have advanced in technical sophistication, enabling new generations of products to be developed and improved clinical outcomes to be achieved. Despite these improvements, failure rates and patient dissatisfaction remain relatively high. With the number of knee replacement surgeries expected to rise dramatically in the next decade, investing in solutions to address these pitfalls is necessary. In this analysis, the key technological trends driving the orthopedic knee industry are examined and an analysis of patent filings in the field is conducted.

    Knee replacement surgeries can be divided up into different groups: total or partial replacement and primary or revision surgery. Total knee replacement consists of replacing all three compartments of the knee—lateral, medial, and patellofemoral. Partial knee replacement consists of replacing just one or two of those compartments. Further, primary knee replacement surgery refers to the initial replacement surgery while revision knee replacement surgery refers to subsequent surgeries to fix or replace a failing component.

    In 2010, approximately 4.7 million individuals were living with total knee replacements in the United States—comprising approximately 4.55 percent of all people aged 50 or older in the U.S.1 Annually, approximately 262,000 total knee replacement surgeries were performed in 1999 in the United States., rising to approximately 615,000 in 20082 and projected to increase to 3.48 million surgeries in 2030.3 Analysis of U.S. Medicare data from 1997 to 2004 showed an annual failure rate varying between 0.4 and 0.7 percent for total knee replacements, with a total survival rate of 95.9 percent by the eight-year mark.4 A similar analysis of the National Joint Registry for England and Wales in the United Kingdom for total knee replacements between 2003 and 2012 showed a similar total survival rate of 94.6 percent after eight years. When factoring in non-revision reoperations as a further endpoint, however, the survival rate at eight years drops to 87.2 percent, with partial knee replacement survival rate even lower at 80.4 percent.5 Outside of clinical failures, a study of primary total knee replacements from 2001 to 2005 showed as much as 19 percent of patients were dissatisfied with their replacement after just one year.6

    Patient dissatisfaction or the failure of a knee replacement hinges upon a variety of factors. Patient dissatisfaction typically revolves around lingering pain in the knee or inability to perform daily and leisure activities. Clinical failure, however, can be attributed largely to aseptic loosening, instability, or infection. A retrospective review of 844 failed knees operated on at six different orthopedic institutions for revision surgery between 2010 and 2011 showed that 31.2 percent of those surgeries were necessitated by aseptic loosening, 18.7 percent by instability, and 16.2 percent by infection.7

    To improve clinical outcomes, knee replacement prosthetic designs have been trending toward customization. In 1974, the Howmedica Total Condylar implant, which was available in three sizes, was introduced. By 1986, the Johnson & Johnson PFC implant was available in six sizes and featured left and right components. Currently, modern knee implants are typically available in eight to 10 sizes for femoral and tibial components.8 Besides customization in the prosthetic components, increased customization is also being pursued in surgical guides and placement jigs, allowing for a level of customization while using standard off-the-shelf prosthetic components.

    In such a well-established space, the question remains as to how key players are differentiating themselves and if there are ways new companies can leverage innovation to find space in which to operate. Analysis of patent portfolios in the knee replacement space can yield insights into these questions by identifying the intellectual property strategies employed by different companies. This analysis was limited to U.S. and English-language European (EP) and Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) patents and patent applications.


    Table 1: Cooperative Patent Classification subgroups. Unshaded subgroups were searched in this analysis, shaded subgroups are provided for hierarchical context.

    The search was limited to filings in the past five years and focused on one United States Patent Classification subclass—623/20.14 (prostheses for the knee joint bone)—and 12 Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subgroups within the A61B and A61F subclasses (Table 1). The search was further limited by excluding patents with claims focused on surgical jigs/guides/tools, surgical methods, and manufacturing methods. A patent landscape of representative assignees in the field was generated from the collected set of documents. Patent documents relevant to the search focus were attributed for the type of knee replacement prosthetic (total or partial), the component being described (tibial, femoral, or meniscal), and the level of customization (fully customized, not customized, modular components, or multiple sizes/shapes) based on the claims (Table 2).


    Table 2: Patents and published applications from top assignees disclosing knee replacement prosthetic designs. Shading is determined by the percentage of each assignee’s portfolio claiming the listed feature, and numbers indicate the number of patents for each feature.

    In this analysis, knee replacement prosthetics not customized to an individual patient were the most common, comprising 82.6 percent of all collected documents. These patents were prevalent in the portfolios of traditional orthopedic companies such as Zimmer Biomet (85.4 percent of their collected filings), Johnson & Johnson (97.1 percent), Smith & Nephew (95.5 percent), and Stryker (83.3 percent), while comprising a smaller fraction in the portfolio of ConforMIS (15.8 percent). When considering the varying levels of customization available for knee replacement prosthetics, this analysis found that 26 percent of the collected documents claimed some level of customization with individualized customization to one patient being the most common (15.8 percent) followed by modular components and multiple sizes or shapes (5.1 percent each). Analysis of the type of knee replacement described in the patent shows that specifying either a total or a partial knee replacement was not common—only 13.1 percent of the collected documents specified a total knee replacement and 12.1 percent specified a partial knee replacement. Furthermore, documents claiming details of a femoral (67.8 percent) or a tibial (60.9 percent) component of a knee replacement were far more common than documents claiming details of a meniscal replacement (8.3 percent).

    Our analysis also suggests differing IP strategies employed by different companies in the knee replacement space. Johnson & Johnson’s filings remain largely in knee replacements that are not patient customized (97.1 percent) with some that mention utilizing modular components for a level of customization (8.6 percent). Smith & Nephew similarly has filings focused on knee replacements that are not patient customized (95.5 percent). Their filings suggest that, at least in recent years, these two companies have focused on updating non-custom designs rather than innovate in areas of customization. ConforMIS, a relatively new company to the space, is more readily focused on patient customized implants, standing in contrast to Johnson & Johnson and Smith & Nephew. Lastly, Zimmer Biomet’s filings show they are pursuing patent protection for non-customized as well as customized knee replacements. Their strategy addresses updating the designs of traditional non-custom knee implants as well as innovations into fully customized options as well.

    Looking at currently available commercial products (Table 3) can further validate the analysis of the IP strategies. Depuy Synthes (subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and Smith & Nephew lack any individually customized products, while ConforMIS’ product suite entirely surrounds individually customized knee implants, which closely matches its patent portfolio. An example of Zimmer Biomet’s investment into more customized options is its Gender Solutions suite of prosthetic implants, which have shapes and sizes that are tailored based on gender. Although gender customization is not a feature specifically attributed for in this analysis, when reviewing Zimmer Biomet’s IP portfolio, one granted patent with claims for a gender customized implant (US9173744B2) was discovered. Another patent application in the company’s portfolio has claims directed at implants customized based on ethnic background (US20160000571A1), although that does not currently seem to be a commercially available product.


    Table 3: Representative examples of currently available products broken down by company and level of customization.

    This analysis of the intellectual property surrounding knee replacements only addresses a fraction of the space, examining patents related to the actual prosthetic but excluding supporting technologies such as surgical guides and tools or advances in converting imaging data to custom components. From this analysis, it is apparent that ConforMIS is actively differentiating itself from competitors by focusing its efforts into individually customized implants while Zimmer Biomet seems to also be exploring opportunities in that space. The other top assignees seem to be sticking with the non-custom options. It is possible that their innovations could be focused more in the areas excluded from this analysis. As the knee implant market continues to expand, these differing strategies employed by the top companies could mark the beginning of a shift in the types of products available. It remains to be seen which of these innovations will prove to be better for patient satisfaction and clinical success. 

    References
    1. Kremers, Hilal Maradit, Dirk R. Larson, Cynthia S. Crowson, Walter K. Kremers, Raynard E. Washington, Claudia A. Steiner, William A. Jiranek, and Daniel J. Berry. “Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 97.17 (2015): 1386-397. Web.
    2. Losina, Elena, Thomas S. Thornhill, Benjamin N. Rome, John Wright, and Jeffrey N. Katz. “The Dramatic Increase in Total Knee Replacement Utilization Rates in the United States Cannot Be Fully Explained by Growth in Population Size and the Obesity Epidemic.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 94.3 (2012): 201-07. Web.
    3. Kurtz, Steven, Kevin Ong, Edmund Lau, Fionna Mowat, and Michael Halpern. “Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 89.4 (2007): 780-85. Web.
    4. Slover, James D., Harry E. Rubash, Henrik Malchau, and Joseph A. Bosco. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Custom Total Knee Cutting Blocks.” The Journal of Arthroplasty 27.2 (2012): 180-85. Web.
    5. Liddle, Alexander D., Andrew Judge, Hemant Pandit, and David W. Murray. “Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.” The Lancet 384.9952 (2014): 1437-445. Web.
    6. Bourne, Robert B., Bert M. Chesworth, Aileen M. Davis, Nizar N. Mahomed, and Kory D. J. Charron. “Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 468.1 (2009): 57-63. Web.
    7. Schroer, William C., Keith R. Berend, Adolph V. Lombardi, C. Lowry Barnes, Michael P. Bolognesi, Michael E. Berend, Merrill A. Ritter, and Ryan M. Nunley. “Why Are Total Knees Failing Today? Etiology of Total Knee Revision in 2010 and 2011.” The Journal of Arthroplasty 28.8 (2013): 116-19. Web.
    8. Slamin, John, and Brian Parsley. “Evolution of customization design for total knee arthroplasty.” Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 5.4 (2012): 290-95. Web.

    Justin Wen is an IP strategy consultant at Global Prior Art Inc., a Boston, Mass.-based company focused on intellectual property research and analysis. For more than 30 years, Global has served many of the world’s leading companies and law firms, addressing more than 16,000 topics. The author declares no competing interests.
    Related Searches
    • biomet
    • defects
    • total knee replacement
    • implant market
    Suggested For You
    Zimmer Biomet Launches the Persona Partial Knee System Worldwide Zimmer Biomet Launches the Persona Partial Knee System Worldwide
    Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms
    Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms
    2. DePuy Synthes 2. DePuy Synthes
    3. Zimmer Biomet 3. Zimmer Biomet
    The 5-Step Design Pathway to the Perfect Instrument The 5-Step Design Pathway to the Perfect Instrument
    Anika Therapeutics Appoints New President Anika Therapeutics Appoints New President
    EOS imaging Names President, North America EOS imaging Names President, North America
    Zimmer Biomet Announces Leadership Transition Zimmer Biomet Announces Leadership Transition
    Spinal Elements Names New President & COO Spinal Elements Names New President & COO
    Smith & Nephew Expands NAVIO Robotic Surgery System into Total Knee Smith & Nephew Expands NAVIO Robotic Surgery System into Total Knee
    Conventus Orthopaedics Appoints New CEO Conventus Orthopaedics Appoints New CEO
    Zimmer Biomet Resolves FDA Warning Letter for China Facility Zimmer Biomet Resolves FDA Warning Letter for China Facility
    Extremities Market is Still Maturing Extremities Market is Still Maturing
    Zimmer Biomet Recalls Implantable Spinal Fusion Stimulators Zimmer Biomet Recalls Implantable Spinal Fusion Stimulators

    Related Features

    • 3-D Printing/Additive Mfg.
      Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Orthopedic Industry

      Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Orthopedic Industry

      Direct metal printing enables a number of benefits to enhance today’s bone replacement offerings.
      Hannelore Eykens and Ruben Wauthle, Ph.D., 3D Systems—Healthcare 03.21.18

    • Spine/Neurology
      Exiting a World of Pain

      Exiting a World of Pain

      Groundbreaking neurostimulation technologies could help mitigate opioid abuse among chronic pain patients.
      Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 03.21.18

    • Coatings/Surface Modification | Laser Processing | Machining & Tooling
      Maintaining a Laser Focus

      Maintaining a Laser Focus

      Laser machining and processing advance to enable more applications for orthopedic device manufacturers.
      Mark Crawford, Contributing Writer 03.21.18


    • Design | Research & Development
      Top Ten Design Rules for Orthopedic Device Development

      Top Ten Design Rules for Orthopedic Device Development

      While every engineer draws from their own experiences, one designer shares his top ten guidelines for every project.
      John Pepper, PE, Principal Engineer, Nextremity Solutions 02.12.18

    • Packaging & Sterilization
      At the End of the Line—Packaging & Sterilization

      At the End of the Line—Packaging & Sterilization

      In order to ensure a smooth transition from manufacturing to market, packaging and sterilization should be considered early.
      Mark Crawford, Contributing Writer 02.12.18

    • Biologics
      Biological Building Blocks

      Biological Building Blocks

      Manufacturers and researchers increasingly are using Mother Nature as a model to devise new healing technologies.
      Michael Barbella, Managing Editor 02.12.18


    • Reshaping the Tools of the Trade—Instrument Manufacturing

      Reshaping the Tools of the Trade—Instrument Manufacturing

      Surgical instrument manufacturers must be aware of rising single-use instrument adoption and surgeon ergonomics.
      Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 02.12.18

    • 3-D Printing/Additive Mfg. | Design | Prototyping | Research & Development
      Bringing Conceptual Design to Life Through Prototypes

      Bringing Conceptual Design to Life Through Prototypes

      OEMs seek to address speed to market and manufacturability considerations through prototype solutions.
      Mark Crawford, Contributing Writer 11.21.17

    • Physician, Reinvent Thyself: A Look at Surgeon Inventors

      Physician, Reinvent Thyself: A Look at Surgeon Inventors

      Follow the stories of two orthopedic surgeons who realized unmet clinical needs and brought them to life.
      Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 11.21.17


    • Medtech Mettle: A Year in Review

      Medtech Mettle: A Year in Review

      Steely resolve and resolutions helped the orthopedic industry survive a politically tumultuous year.
      Michael Barbella, Managing Editor 11.21.17

    • Laser Processing | Machining & Tooling
      Machining Medicine: Insights into Precision and Laser Machining Demands

      Machining Medicine: Insights into Precision and Laser Machining Demands

      New capabilities and functionality keep precision and laser machining relevant for orthopedic technologies.
      Mark Crawford, Contributing Writer 10.02.17

    • 3-D Printing/Additive Mfg. | Contract Manufacturing | Design | Materials | Prototyping | Research & Development
      Back to the Drawing Board: Designing Orthopedic Devices

      Back to the Drawing Board: Designing Orthopedic Devices

      Cost pressures, regulatory hurdles, and novel manufacturing methods challenge orthopedic technology designers' creativity.
      Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 10.02.17

    • 3-D Printing/Additive Mfg. | Materials | Spine/Neurology
      Distinguished Support: A Review of Spinal Orthopedic Technologies

      Distinguished Support: A Review of Spinal Orthopedic Technologies

      Success and market share in the slow-growing, crowded spinal sector are dependent upon differentiated solutions.
      Michael Barbella, Managing Editor 10.02.17

    • Biologics | Bracing/Prosthetics | Extremities | Imaging | Instruments | Large Joint | Spine/Neurology | Trauma/Sports
      Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms

      Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms

      This year’s Top 10 company report illuminated a number of trends within the orthopedic market.
      Sean Fenske, Editor; Michael Barbella, Managing Editor; Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 08.15.17

    • An Outsourcing Focus in San Diego

      An Outsourcing Focus in San Diego

      The MPO Summit travels to southern California for sun, surf, networking, and industry insights.
      Sean Fenske , Editor 08.15.17


    Breaking News
    • A Biodegradable Bone-Fixing Composite Made Partly of Spider Silk
    • Advanced Biomedical Technologies Receives Chinese CFDA Approval of Polymer Fixation Screws
    • Smith & Nephew’s Expert Connect Center Endorsed by Royal College of Surgeons
    • Stradis Healthcare Announces New Medical Device Packaging Division Director
    • Oregon Surgical Institute to Implement Zimmer Biomet Signature Solutions Outpatient Program
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    March/April 2018

    • Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Orthopedic Industry
    • Exiting a World of Pain
    • Maintaining a Laser Focus
    • View More >

    Copyright © 2018 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.