Stay updated with the most recent editions of ODT Magazine, featuring comprehensive coverage of the latest innovations and developments.
Access the full digital version of ODT Magazine, complete with interactive features and enhanced content for a seamless reading experience.
Join the ODT community! Subscribe to receive the latest industry news and insights delivered directly to your mailbox.
Discover how 3D printing and additive manufacturing are revolutionizing orthopedic device design and production processes.
Learn about contract manufacturing solutions in the orthopedic sector, emphasizing quality, compliance, and operational excellence.
Stay informed on the latest research and development trends in orthopedic device design, driving innovation and patient care improvements.
Explore the latest advancements in surgical instruments and technologies that enhance precision and outcomes in orthopedic procedures.
Discover cutting-edge machining and laser processing techniques that improve the quality and performance of orthopedic devices.
Learn about the innovative materials shaping orthopedic devices, focusing on performance, biocompatibility, and regulatory compliance.
Stay updated on advanced molding techniques for producing high-quality orthopedic components that meet industry standards.
Explore best practices for packaging and sterilization methods that ensure the safety and efficacy of orthopedic devices.
Discover the role of software solutions in enhancing orthopedic device design, functionality, patient management, and regulatory compliance.
Learn about essential testing methods and standards that ensure the safety, reliability, and effectiveness of orthopedic devices.
Stay ahead with real-time updates on significant news impacting the orthopedic device sector.
Access unique content and insights not available in the print edition of ODT Magazine, offering deeper dives into important topics.
Explore feature articles that provide in-depth analysis on specific topics within orthopedic design and technology.
Gain insights from industry experts through regular columns addressing critical challenges and innovations in orthopedics.
Read the editorial insights on current trends and highlights from the latest issue of ODT Magazine.
Discover leading companies in orthopedic design and technology, showcasing their innovations and contributions to the field.
Explore detailed profiles of companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector, highlighting their capabilities and offerings.
Learn about the expertise and resources of leading companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector.
Watch informative videos featuring industry leaders discussing trends, technologies, and innovations in orthopedic design.
Enjoy short, engaging videos that provide quick insights and updates on key topics within orthopedics.
Tune in to discussions with industry experts sharing their insights on trends, challenges, and innovations in orthopedic technology.
Participate in informative webinars led by industry experts covering various relevant topics in orthopedic design and manufacturing.
Stay informed on the latest press releases and announcements from leading companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector.
Access comprehensive eBooks that delve into various topics in orthopedic device manufacturing and innovation.
Highlighting the pioneers and innovators driving advancements in orthopedic technology and patient care.
Explore sponsored articles and insights from leading companies in the orthopedic industry.
Read in-depth whitepapers that examine key issues, trends, and research findings in orthopedic design and technology.
Discover major industry events, trade shows, and conferences focused on orthopedic technology and innovations.
Get real-time updates and insights from major industry shows and exhibitions happening around the world.
Participate in the ODT Forum, addressing orthopedic design and manufacturing technology trends, innovations, and industry challenges.
Attend the MPO Summit for insights and strategies from industry leaders shaping the future of medical device technology.
Join discussions and networking opportunities at the MPO Medtech Forum, focusing on the latest trends and challenges in the industry.
Explore advertising opportunities with ODT to connect with a targeted audience of orthopedic professionals.
Review our editorial guidelines for submissions and contributions to ODT.
Read about our commitment to protecting your privacy and personal information.
Familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions governing the use of odtmag.com.
What are you searching for?
August 4, 2014
By: Michael Barbella
Managing Editor
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released two long-awaited draft guidances for how medical device and pharmaceutical companies should discuss their products online and, in particular, on social media. “These documents strive to ensure that the information provided by drug and device companies is accurate and will help patients to make well-informed decisions in consultation with their health care providers,” wrote Thomas Abrams, director of the FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion on the FDA’s blog. The first guidance provides recommendations for the presentation of risk and benefit information for prescription drugs or medical devices using Internet/social media sources with character space limitations, such as Twitter and the paid search results links on Google and Yahoo. These recommendations address the presentation of both benefit information and risk information in this setting. “We understand that communicating on electronic Internet sites with character space limitations can be challenging,” Abrams said. “But, no matter the Internet source used, benefit claims in product promotions should be balanced with risk information. And companies should provide a way for consumers to gain direct access to a more complete discussion of risks associated with their products.” This guidance gives detailed examples on the use of Twitter, which is limiting as it allows only 140 characters per message. The document acknowledges these limitations, but makes assertions such as if a product is mentioned with one benefit, at least the most severe risk also should be mentioned in the same marketing message regardless of the length limitations. The second guidance provides recommendations to companies that choose to correct third-party information related to their own prescription drugs and medical devices. This draft guidance provides FDA’s recommendations on the correction of misinformation from independent third parties on the Internet and through social media sites. “For example, we recommend that any corrections should address all misinformation in a clearly defined portion of a forum on the Internet or social media, whether the misinformation is positive or negative,” Abrams said. The second guidance gives numerous examples of situations in which companies should or should not correct misinformation. The agency does not intend to monitor companies’ efforts to correct misinformation disseminated online, but suggests that companies keep good records on every instance of misinformation and corrective actions. Updated Plan to Improve Device Review Procedures The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released a detailed plan to improve medical device review procedures within the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) based on recommendations from an outside auditor’s report issued late last year. The FDA intends to implement a two-stage process to address four major recommendations of a report released by consultants Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) in December 2013. To meet those recommendations,the firm advised the FDA to establish more consistency in decision-making, ramp up its training programs and address quality management issues to make the review process more transparent and standardized for reviewers and the companies undergoing review. “A recurring issue that was identified during our analyses was inconsistent decision-making throughout various stages of the review process, in particular a lack of transparency in thresholds or requirements used to trigger AI (additional information) requests,” Booz Allen’s report states. “In addition, industry stakeholders reported inconsistencies between reviewers referencing outdated guidance during submission reviews, as well as reviewers referencing new standards that were not yet finalized at the time of original submission. Development of tools, criteria and/or mechanisms for assessing and ensuring the consistency of review processes would help ameliorate this issue.” Booz Allen initially identified 31 “unique” issues related to the device submission review process. The consulting firm concluded that CDRH officials had taken steps to address 21 of those 31 issues, either through the development and implementation of new Medical Device User Fee Amendment (MDUFA) III provisions, updated systems, and/or processes for review staff—and that the division had begun to address another nine of the issues. Only one issue—creating the tools and metrics to assess the consistency of decision-making across the program—remained, and it was the driver for one of the contractor’s high-priority recommendations, CDRH Director Jeffrey Shuren, M.D., said in a blog. After the December report came out, the CDRH put together its own plan to implement the Booz Allen recommendations. Its strategy calls for:
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !