Stay updated with the most recent editions of ODT Magazine, featuring comprehensive coverage of the latest innovations and developments.
Access the full digital version of ODT Magazine, complete with interactive features and enhanced content for a seamless reading experience.
Join the ODT community! Subscribe to receive the latest industry news and insights delivered directly to your mailbox.
Discover how 3D printing and additive manufacturing are revolutionizing orthopedic device design and production processes.
Learn about contract manufacturing solutions in the orthopedic sector, emphasizing quality, compliance, and operational excellence.
Stay informed on the latest research and development trends in orthopedic device design, driving innovation and patient care improvements.
Explore the latest advancements in surgical instruments and technologies that enhance precision and outcomes in orthopedic procedures.
Discover cutting-edge machining and laser processing techniques that improve the quality and performance of orthopedic devices.
Learn about the innovative materials shaping orthopedic devices, focusing on performance, biocompatibility, and regulatory compliance.
Stay updated on advanced molding techniques for producing high-quality orthopedic components that meet industry standards.
Explore best practices for packaging and sterilization methods that ensure the safety and efficacy of orthopedic devices.
Discover the role of software solutions in enhancing orthopedic device design, functionality, patient management, and regulatory compliance.
Learn about essential testing methods and standards that ensure the safety, reliability, and effectiveness of orthopedic devices.
Stay ahead with real-time updates on significant news impacting the orthopedic device sector.
Access unique content and insights not available in the print edition of ODT Magazine, offering deeper dives into important topics.
Explore feature articles that provide in-depth analysis on specific topics within orthopedic design and technology.
Gain insights from industry experts through regular columns addressing critical challenges and innovations in orthopedics.
Read the editorial insights on current trends and highlights from the latest issue of ODT Magazine.
Discover leading companies in orthopedic design and technology, showcasing their innovations and contributions to the field.
Explore detailed profiles of companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector, highlighting their capabilities and offerings.
Learn about the expertise and resources of leading companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector.
Watch informative videos featuring industry leaders discussing trends, technologies, and innovations in orthopedic design.
Enjoy short, engaging videos that provide quick insights and updates on key topics within orthopedics.
Tune in to discussions with industry experts sharing their insights on trends, challenges, and innovations in orthopedic technology.
Participate in informative webinars led by industry experts covering various relevant topics in orthopedic design and manufacturing.
Stay informed on the latest press releases and announcements from leading companies in the orthopedic device manufacturing sector.
Access comprehensive eBooks that delve into various topics in orthopedic device manufacturing and innovation.
Highlighting the pioneers and innovators driving advancements in orthopedic technology and patient care.
Explore sponsored articles and insights from leading companies in the orthopedic industry.
Read in-depth whitepapers that examine key issues, trends, and research findings in orthopedic design and technology.
Discover major industry events, trade shows, and conferences focused on orthopedic technology and innovations.
Get real-time updates and insights from major industry shows and exhibitions happening around the world.
Participate in the ODT Forum, addressing orthopedic design and manufacturing technology trends, innovations, and industry challenges.
Attend the MPO Summit for insights and strategies from industry leaders shaping the future of medical device technology.
Join discussions and networking opportunities at the MPO Medtech Forum, focusing on the latest trends and challenges in the industry.
Explore advertising opportunities with ODT to connect with a targeted audience of orthopedic professionals.
Review our editorial guidelines for submissions and contributions to ODT.
Read about our commitment to protecting your privacy and personal information.
Familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions governing the use of odtmag.com.
What are you searching for?
Long-term efficacy of some spine surgeries still relatively uncertain, surgeon says.
According to two studies published recently in The Spine Journal, patients reported limited, positive short-term benefits to surgical vs. non-operative care, yet the long-term benefit did not seem to hold up when comparing treatment options for chronic low back pain. Patient access to and compliance with non-operative treatment programs appear to deliver results comparable to surgery, but with fewer risks and lower costs, according to the study’s authors. “Despite major advances in spine research, technology and treatment, the long-term efficacy of particular spine surgeries is still relatively uncertain,” said Eugene Carragee, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon and editor in chief of The Spine Journal. “Studies like these are essential to help spine specialists offer appropriate treatments for their patients.” The first study, “One-year outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for discogenic back pain: A community-based prospective cohort study,” concluded that patients who received surgery for discogenic back pain showed slighter greater improvement at one year compared with a non-operatively-treated group, although the composite success rate for both treatment groups was only fair. In this study, 495 patients with discogenic back pain were enrolled. Eighty-six patients (17 percent) had surgery within six months of enrollment. Surgery consisted of instrumented fusion (79 percent), disc replacement (12 percent), laminectomy or discectomy (9 percent). Surgical patients reported more severe pain and physical disability at baseline and were more likely to have had prior surgery. Adjusting for baseline differences among groups, surgery showed a limited benefit over nonsurgical treatment of 5.4 points on the modified (23-point) Roland-Morris back disability questionnaire one year after enrollment. Using a composite definition of “success” incorporating 30 percent improvement in the Roland score, 30 percent improvement in pain, no opioid pain medication use, and working (if relevant), the one-year success rate was 33 percent for surgery and 15 percent for nonsurgical treatment. The rate of re-operation was 11 percent in the surgical group; the rate of surgery after treatment designation in the nonsurgical group was 6 percent at 12 months after enrollment. “The results should be interpreted cautiously because outcomes are short-term, and treatment was not randomly assigned,” study authors advised. “Only 5 percent of nonsurgical patients received cognitive behavior therapy. Nonsurgical treatment that patients received was variable and mostly not compliant with major guidelines.” The authors of the study are Sohail K. Mirza, M.D., MPH, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth in Hanover, N.H.; Richard A. Deyo, M.D., MPH, Department of Family Medicine, the Department of Medicine, the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Center for Research in Occupational and Environmental Toxicology Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.; Patrick J. Heagerty, Ph.D., Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.; Judith A. Turner, Ph.D., Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington in Seattle; Brook I. Martin, Ph.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; and Bryan A. Comstock, MS, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington in Seattle. The second study, “Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: Long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials,” concluded that after an average of 11 years follow-up, there was no difference in patient self-rated outcomes between spine fusion and multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioral and exercise rehabilitation for chronic low back pain (cLBP). In this landmark study, 473 patients with cLBP of at least one year’s duration and who were all considered candidates for spinal fusion received either surgery or multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioral and exercise rehabilitation. Of the original 473 patients, 261 completed outcomes questionnaires (140 had received instrumented or non-instrumented spinal fusion and stabilization surgery and 121 had received multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioral and exercise rehabilitation). The average follow-up was 11.4 [range 8–15] years after the initial treatment. The intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically or clinically significant differences between treatment groups for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at LTFU (adjusted for baseline ODI, previous surgery, duration of LBP, sex, age, and smoking habit): the mean adjusted treatment effect of fusion was _0.7 points on the 0–100 ODI scale (95 percent confidence interval [CI], -5.5 to 4.2). An as-treated analysis similarly demonstrated no advantage of surgery (treatment effect, -0.8 points on the ODI (95 percent CI, -5.9 to 4.3). The results for the secondary outcomes were largely consistent with those of the ODI, showing no relevant group differences. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity, pain frequency, pain medication use, work status, EuroQol VAS for health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care, and global treatment outcome at long-term follow-up. The study’s authors conclude that, given the increased risks of surgery and the lack of deterioration in non-operative outcomes over time, multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioral and exercise rehabilitation programs should be favored. The authors of the study are Anne F. Mannion, Ph.D., Department of Research and Development, Spine Center, Zurich, Switzerland; Jens Ivar Brox, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Orthopedics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and Jeremy C.T. Fairbank, M.D., FRCS, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, the United Kingdom.
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !