• Login
    • Join
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Exclusives
    • Manufacturing
    • Markets
    • Top 10
    • Buyers' Guide
    • Events
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Exclusives
  • Manufacturing
  • Markets
  • Top 10
  • Buyers' Guide
  • Events
  • Microsites
  • Current & Past Issues
    Features
    Departments
    Columns
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Editorial Guidelines
    eNewsletter Archive
    eBook
    Top Features
    Innovation Iteration: Latest Advancements in Design & Prototyping

    Robot Recharge: Orthopedic Surgical Robotics Update

    Fine Print: Examining 3D Printing for Orthopedics

    Pulsed Electrochemical Machining: Achieved Through Chemistry

    Packaging and Sterilization Update for Orthopedic Devices
    Breaking News
    Certifications
    Clinical Trials
    Device Approvals & Patents
    Financial & Deals
    International
    Market Data & Trends
    OEM News
    Orthopedic Innovators
    People
    Product & Service Releases
    Products
    Quality, Recalls & Risk
    Regulatory & Legal
    Supplier & Contract Mfg.
    Live From Shows
    Top News & Features
    FDA Clears Anika Therapeutics' X-Twist Knotless Fixation System

    Paragon 28 Rolls Out TenoTac 2.0 Hammertoe and Soft Tissue Repair

    Cionic Expands Scientific Advisory Board

    First Surgeries Performed Using Globus Medical's Excelsius3D

    Envista To Acquire Osteogenics
    3-D Printing/Additive Mfg.
    Assembly & Automation
    Biocompatibility & Testing
    Clean Room
    Coatings/Surface Modification
    Contract Manufacturing
    Design
    Extrusion
    Finishing
    Forging & Casting
    Instruments, Cases & Trays
    International/Offshoring
    Laser Processing
    Materials
    Machining & Tooling
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    Prototyping
    Research & Developement
    Software & Quality
    Staffing, Training & Prof. Dev.
    Supply Chain

    Denise Pedulla Appointed as Chief Legal Officer at Conformis

    ODT's Most-Read Stories This Week—May 14

    Steven Haddad Joins Extremity Medical as Chief Clinical Officer

    FDA OKs Accelus' FlareHawk TiHawk11 Interbodies

    Gary Fischetti Joins Conformis’ Board of Directors
    Biologics
    Bracing/Prosthetics
    Extremities
    Imaging
    Instruments
    Large Joint
    MIS/Robotics
    Spine/Neurology
    Trauma/Sports
    Top Markets
    It’s All About the Data for Supply Chain and Inventory Management

    Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery

    Giving Athletes Their Lives Back with Better Knee Braces

    ODT Forum '22 is Another Successful Orthopedic Tech Conference

    5 Ways AI Will Impact Orthopedic Surgery's Future
    Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    White Papers
    Add New Company
    International Buyers Guide Companies
    Huron Tool & Cutter Grinding Co. Inc.

    ARCH Medical Solutions

    Eagle Stainless Tube & Fabrication Inc.

    Orchid Orthopedic Solutions

    Medbio LLC
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    • Magazine
      • Current & Past Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Departments
      • Columns
      • Digital Edition
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Editorial Guidelines
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
      • eBook
    • Breaking News
    • Buyers' Guide
      • Companies
      • Categories
      • Company Capabilities
      • White Papers
      • Add Your Company
    • Manufacturing
      • 3-D Printing/Additive Mfg.
      • Assembly & Automation
      • Biocompatibility & Testing
      • Clean Room
      • Coatings/Surface Modification
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Design
      • Extrusion
      • Finishing
      • Forging & Casting
      • Instruments, Cases & Trays
      • International/Offshoring
      • Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Machining & Tooling
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • Prototyping
      • Research & Developement
      • Software & Quality
      • Staffing, Training & Prof. Dev.
      • Supply Chain
    • Markets
      • Biologics
      • Bracing/Prosthetics
      • Extremities
      • Imaging
      • Instruments
      • Large Joint
      • MIS/Robotics
      • Spine/Neurology
      • Trauma/Sports
    • Top 10
    • Online Exclusives
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Events
      • Industry Events
    • Live from Show Event
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
      • Advertise With Us
    Features

    Automated Analysis Advantages for Part Validation

    Accomplishing part fabrication validation can be better facilitated through the incorporation of automated protocols.

    Automated Analysis Advantages for Part Validation
    Related CONTENT
    • Lowell Inc.
    • Lyons
    • Pediatric Orthopedics Taken Off the Back Burner
    • Atlas Spine Receives 510K Clearance for Cervical Plating System
    • Zimmer Biomet Receives FDA Clearance for Meniscal Repair Device
    Edward Jaeck, Vice President of Strategic Growth and Business Development, Lowell Inc.09.17.19
    Applying automation to data analysis is invaluable. It speeds up repetitive manual analysis, and reduces defects created by data integrity errors as well as simple errors made by the analyst. In addition, it creates standard work, which is easier to audit and train to. While not all data sets behave perfectly, there are several layers of criteria that can be applied to help automate data analysis.


    Figure 1: Image of round component with four critical dimensions. All images, tables, and graphs courtesy of Lowell Inc.

    Current Situation
    Currently, many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and contract manufacturers use Minitab for their statistical data analysis. While Minitab is a very powerful tool for data analysis, without macros, it can be cumbersome to do the same analysis with coherent summaries for large datasets in a standard-work manner. For example, imagine working with a round component as presented in Figure 1. It is a relatively simple component with four critical dimensions, which are on display in Table 1.

    Table 1: Table of the four critical features of the component in Figure 1 with nominal dimensions and tolerances.

    Now, imagine a customer wants its supplier to complete Operational Qualification (OQ) and Performance Qualification (PQ) for this component. For the OQ, the customer has insisted on three lots identified as High, Low, and Nominal. For the PQ, the customer has insisted on running three lots with each lot being run on a separate day, shift, operator, and, if possible, material batches. Assuming there are four critical features in the washer component, there will be four dimensions for OQ High, four for OQ Low, and four for OQ Nominal. In addition, there will be four for PQ1, PQ2, and PQ3. If there was just one data point for each dimension in each lot, a very simple data collection template would suffice (Table 2).


    Table 2: Validation table showing OQ and PQ as separate columns.

    In industry, N=1 data point per feature for OQ and PQ is never collected. The sample size is always greater than that, and in the orthopedic industry, sample size is often N=30. Once there is more than N=1 data point per lot, Table 2 would need to be altered, as the rows become the data, the number of columns increases, and the labels change.

    For example, for outer diameter (OD), there would need to be six columns—OD OQ High, OD OQ Low, OD OQ Nominal, OD PQ1, OD PQ2, and OD PQ3. Following the same logic, the same six columns would be required for inner diameter (ID), inner diameter position (IDTP), and thickness (THK). Simply, there are four features in each of six validation lots (4*6=24 columns of data). Once the columns are labeled in Minitab, the data analysis can commence. Key inputs for each of the four variables are the specification limits. For OD, ID, and THK, two-sided spec limits can be expected; for the IDTP, an upper spec limit only can be expected. Once the spec limits are known, the process of checking assumptions, analyzing the data, and copying and pasting the results to a summary table can begin. An example of a completed data collection template is presented in Table 3.


    Table 3: Updated validation table with twenty-four columns and thirty rows of data for each lot-feature.

    Problem Statement
    Those who have used Minitab to perform data analysis know it begins as a “fun” exercise. You are immersed into the data, are able to manipulate it, tease patterns out of it, and learn more about the process. Unfortunately, that enjoyment may only last an hour or less before the experience becomes monotonous. Typing in spec limits over and over again, making the same plots repeatedly, cutting and pasting data to the summary table, missing digits, pasting data incorrectly, and having to redo analysis begins to affect the analyst. Not only is the task tiresome, it can also create data integrity issues while each cut and paste enables operator defects to creep in.

    Luckily, there is a better process involving automation within Minitab. Using a custom macro eliminates the potential for errors in a number of ways.

    Contents of a Solid Validation Data Analysis
    Having performed data analysis at Fortune 500 level organizations such as Intel and Medtronic, as well as for clients of Lowell, it is understood there is a huge amount of pressure on the data analysis team to complete the protocol/report as soon as all the data has been collected. Those unfamiliar with the process simply do not have an appreciation for how detail-oriented one must be to perform this analysis correctly to ensure everyone in the organization, even potential naysayers, will be comfortable with the analysis.

    Oftentimes, communications break down based on roles and priorities. Project managers may want to push things forward. R&D may support the project managers and may attempt to sugar coat the data to move it forward. Meanwhile, a conservative quality engineer or manager may think it is their job to reject the whole protocol due to a missed assumption or calculation mishap. From a new product introduction team perspective, each party is performing their role as they deem necessary—project managers are graded on hitting milestones for the project, R&D engineers evaluated on the device functioning properly and getting through design validation, and quality is assessed on the number of field complaints, recalls, and FDA findings later.

    By defining a custom-automated macro that all parties agree upon, one can get all parties on board with the validation requirements and passing criteria. The success criteria for each feature in the validation plan can then be defined.

    Incorporating time into the schedule for this team discussion regarding validation is a solid investment as some departments are not always aware of the requirements set forth in FDA guidelines or the company’s procedures for validations.

    A great first step for any validation strategy is to create enough samples to pass an attribute sampling plan. While it may seem like overkill, re-running a validation because the first one failed is a much more significant expense. Delays to market can often be two to three times the cost in time. For those in the orthopedic space, it is common for OEMs to use 95 percent Confidence with 90 percent Coverage/Reliability (95/90) for component validations and 95 percent Confidence with 95 percent Coverage/Reliability (95/95) for packaging validations.

    To pass a 95/90 sampling plan with attribute data, one would need to build N=29 samples and have C=0 number of rejects. Translated, that means one would need to build 29 parts with none of them falling outside of specifications. This is simple pass/fail data and can be continuous data that has been artificially dichotomized or it can be naturally occurring dichotomous data by nature. The beauty of powering the validation at the attribute size is it enables a very clean method to determine pass/fail for the validation. Simply put, if all of the columns have data within the spec limits, the validation passes. While this requirement may seem relatively basic, it is not. It is quite difficult to pick 29 random samples and not find one out of spec unless the underlying process is quite capable. By fabricating N=29 samples, the validation team can fall back to an attribute sample size argument should they get bogged down in the continuous data analysis.

    For those companies demanding continuous data, the validation pathway usually consists of either A) confidence/coverage tolerance intervals or B) Cpk (process capability index) or Ppk (process performance index). Both options are nice in the sense they adapt for sample size and can be calculated with smaller sample sizes. Interpreting tolerance intervals is unique, but not difficult; simply take the entire tolerance interval and graph against the spec limits. If the entire tolerance interval falls within spec limits, it passes. If one end of the tolerance interval goes outside one of the spec limits, it fails. Minitab accomplishes this nicely in the tolerance interval graphic although it auto-scales and, sometimes, the user might want to rescale the x-axis to show the spec limits. One thing to note is the Minitab output in the tolerance interval graphic is still limited to three decimal places. If more decimal places are required, the user needs to click the button to store the tolerance intervals to the data worksheet then copy and paste from there.

    Minitab can also be used to calculate the Cpk and Ppk for the data. Ppk is a better option in Minitab as the Cpk estimate comes from the control chart and assumes the data is in exactly perfect time order. The question then becomes “time order of what—the manufacturing, the measurement, or both?” This made more sense in the past when more continuous assembly lines were commonplace; the parts were sampled and then measured immediately to determine the state of control of the process. Now, a validation lot is run and samples are randomly selected, not labeled for time order then run in random order in the lab for measurements. With that said, the Cpk is meaningless since all one needs to do to inflate it is to rearrange some of the data to sort A-Z or Z-A. This puts similar measurements next to each other and minimizes the MR-bar, which then minimizes the estimate of the standard deviation.

    To see this in action, create a random data set and calculate the Cpk via the Sixpack tool in Minitab. Next, sort the same data set A-Z, and calculate the Cpk again. The Cpk will go up because the standard deviation has gone down.

    As an example, take the data for OQ High_OD and run a Sixpack with the data in the original order. With data in order of data collection, the Sixpack presented in Figure 2 is obtained. Note the Cpk is 6.52.


    Figure 2: Sixpack of data in order of data collection.

    Now, copy the same data and paste it into a new column, then sort the data A-Z with the sort function. Re-running the Sixpack on the sorted data will yield the results presented in Figure 3. Note Cpk is now over 50.24. Create some random data and try this yourself. Once you do, you will see the importance of labeling units to the unit-level in time order or skipping Cpk completely and using Ppk in Minitab.


    Figure 3: Sixpack on sorted data.

    As can be seen in Figures 2 and 3, the Ppk remains consistent at 5.79. It is the same because the standard deviation used in the Ppk is the overall standard deviation; sorting the data has no effect.

    Key Aspects of a Validation Summary Report
    1. Ppk: This is the most common requirement for validation plans.
    2. Confidence/Coverage tolerance intervals: This is still very common in the medical device industry as it allows the team to pass with attribute data or continuous data.
    3. Actual Sample Size vs. Sample Size to pass attribute sampling plan: This is key information as we can always fall back to an attribute sample size argument if the continuous data analysis gets bogged down.
    Some customers require Ppk>1.33 from their suppliers as this seems to give them a “warm fuzzy feeling.” In reality, calculating capability without demonstrating process stability can be overly optimistic. For example, at Intel, a minimum of 15 manufacturing lots were required to demonstrate process stability prior to being allowed to discuss capability at a stage gate review. The concept is pretty simple; the goal is to find the special causes, fix them, run again, find, and fix. Then, once the majority of the special causes have been found and fixed in the manufacturing process, one can have confidence in capability calculations. In the medical device industry, there is a slow migration heading in this direction as demonstrated by the verbiage “a minimum of three lots shall be used for PQ.”

    One key assumption for both the tolerance intervals and Ppk calculation is normality. In Minitab, this is easily accomplished with the Anderson-Darling test or the Ryan-Joyner test. Since this is one of the areas where things can become challenging, normality tests based on the Skewness-Kurtosis in the macro are included. To do this, the tests as outlined in Dr. Wayne Taylor’s book1, “Statistical Procedures for the Medical Device Industry,” were followed. (The book is highly recommended for those involved in this aspect of the industry.)

    The logic for the validation is basic:
    • Did the dataset pass a normality test?
      • If data passes normality then the standard Tolerance Interval and Ppk calculations (both assume normality) can be used.
      • If the data does not pass normality tests, check for outliers and re-test, normalize the dataset, or determine if the dataset is “highly capable,”—a process to compare the Ppk estimate to a tabulated value from Dr. Taylor’s book.
    • Did the validation have enough samples to pass an attribute sampling plan and were all of those samples within spec?

    PQ-it Macro Logic
    Now that the logic flow for the validation is understood, that logic can be put to work in the form of a macro. Much of the macro uses standard functions in Minitab; the process flow is as follows:
    • Step 1: Click box for desired Confidence/Coverage required for the validation (options: 95/90, 95/95, or 95/99).
    • Step 2: Check for outliers via the boxplot tool and formal outlier test for each column of data.
    • Step 3: Check for normality using Anderson-Darling, Ryan-Joiner, and Skewness-Kurtosis tests for each column of data.
    • Step 4: Calculate the tolerance intervals for each column of data.
    • Step 5: Calculate Pp and Ppk for each column of data.
    • Step 6: Calculate the actual sample size for each column of data.

    All the graphics are created and can be output to PowerPoint or Word for review. In addition, a set of summary tables is created in the session window, which can be cut and pasted into the final validation report. What previously took four hours for a dataset like the OQ-PQ data set in the previous example has been reduced to less than 20 minutes with a custom macro.

    Conclusion
    Data analysis is a key part of the medical device industry and being able to perform it accurately and efficiently is critical to the success of new products. To help accelerate the process, automation can be applied in statistical programs such as Minitab via macros. The PQ-it macro (created by Lowell Inc.) can analyze up to 200 columns of data and create the key outputs, graphics, and summary tables in PowerPoint and Word in less than 20 minutes. This represents a more than 90 percent reduction in analysis time while greatly minimizing errors. 

    Reference
    1. Taylor, Wayne (2017). Statistical Procedures for the Medical device Industry. Taylor Enterprises, Inc.,www.variation.com.


    Edward Jaeck is vice president of strategic growth and business development at Minneapolis-based Lowell Inc. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and a master’s degree in industrial engineering from Arizona State University, and also a master’s degree in engineering management from the University of Colorado. Edward came to Lowell after serving in previous positions at Intel and Medtronic, where he focused on technology development, supplier development, manufacturing process development, and qualification in support of new product development. He is an ASQ member, a six-sigma black belt, and a past senior GD&T certificate holder. You can contact him at edward.jaeck@lowellinc.com. 
    Related Searches
    • medical
    • technology
    • FDA
    • medical device
    Suggested For You
    Lowell Inc. Lowell Inc.
    Lyons Lyons
    Pediatric Orthopedics Taken Off the Back Burner Pediatric Orthopedics Taken Off the Back Burner
    Atlas Spine Receives 510K Clearance for Cervical Plating System Atlas Spine Receives 510K Clearance for Cervical Plating System
    Zimmer Biomet Receives FDA Clearance for Meniscal Repair Device Zimmer Biomet Receives FDA Clearance for Meniscal Repair Device
    Straightening Out a Spinal Device’s De Novo Pathway Straightening Out a Spinal Device’s De Novo Pathway
    ApiFix Receives FDA Approval for MID-C System ApiFix Receives FDA Approval for MID-C System
    DiscGenics Receives FDA Fast Track Designation DiscGenics Receives FDA Fast Track Designation
    The 2019 Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms The 2019 Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms
    The 2019 Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms The 2019 Top 10 Global Orthopedic Device Firms
    5. Medtronic Spine 5. Medtronic Spine
    A Look to the Future: Observations from the Top 10 Reports A Look to the Future: Observations from the Top 10 Reports
    Biomedical Startup Gears Up for U.S. Launch Biomedical Startup Gears Up for U.S. Launch
    Saluda Medical Secures Debt Financing from Medtronic Saluda Medical Secures Debt Financing from Medtronic
    Medtronic Completes Titan Spine Acquisition Medtronic Completes Titan Spine Acquisition

    Related Content

    • Lowell Inc.

      Lowell Inc.

      ...
      Philip Allen, VP Sales and Marketing 05.26.21

    • Lyons

      Lyons

      ...
      Bill Lyons 05.27.20

    • Spine/Neurology
      Pediatric Orthopedics Taken Off the Back Burner

      Pediatric Orthopedics Taken Off the Back Burner

      There are several different types of scoliosis, a condition that causes a sideways spinal curve, that affect children and adolescents.
      Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 09.17.19


    • Spine/Neurology
      Atlas Spine Receives 510K Clearance for Cervical Plating System

      Atlas Spine Receives 510K Clearance for Cervical Plating System

      Marks another addition to the portfolio of technology developed by Atlas.
      Atlas Spine 09.16.19

    • Large Joint
      Zimmer Biomet Receives FDA Clearance for Meniscal Repair Device

      Zimmer Biomet Receives FDA Clearance for Meniscal Repair Device

      The JuggerStitch will be available to the U.S. market.
      Zimmer Biomet 09.16.19


      Trending
      • GE Additive And Orchid Partner To Advance Scalable Metal 3D Printing | Orthopedic Design Technology
      • Orthotic Brace Suppliers Convicted In $6.5M Fraud Scheme | Orthopedic Design Technology
      • Orthotic Brace Suppliers Convicted in $6.5M Fraud Scheme
      • Minimizing Risks In Minimally Invasive Surgery | Orthopedic Design Technology
      • Alex Gorsky To Step Down As J&J CEO In 2022 | Orthopedic Design Technology
      Breaking News
      • FDA Clears Anika Therapeutics' X-Twist Knotless Fixation System
      • Paragon 28 Rolls Out TenoTac 2.0 Hammertoe and Soft Tissue Repair
      • Cionic Expands Scientific Advisory Board
      • First Surgeries Performed Using Globus Medical's Excelsius3D
      • Envista To Acquire Osteogenics
      View Breaking News >
      CURRENT ISSUE

      March/April 2022

      • Innovation Iteration: Latest Advancements in Design & Prototyping
      • Robot Recharge: Orthopedic Surgical Robotics Update
      • Fine Print: Examining 3D Printing for Orthopedics

      Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
      You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms And Conditions
      • Contact Us

      follow us

      Subscribe
      Nutraceuticals World

      Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

      GOED Creates Infographic Highlighting Omega-3 Health Claims Approved in Europe
      Kyowa Hakko Appoints Dr. Colin Hill to Immuse Scientific Advisory Board
      Expert Consensus Statement: Diet is Best Primary Intervention to Achieve Diabetes Remission
      Coatings World

      Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

      Teknos Receives EcoVadis Gold Medal for Sustainability Performance
      AkzoNobel and Partners Team Up to Hack Carbon Reduction Challenges
      Five PPG Facilities in Ohio Recognized for Sustainability, Health, Safety Practices
      Medical Product Outsourcing

      Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

      Iterative Scopes Expands its Senior Leadership Team
      Viz.ai Raises $100 Million in Series D Funding
      FDA Clears Arterys' AI Mapping and Quantification Tools
      Contract Pharma

      Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

      Piramal Pharma Solutions New API Plant in Canada Now Online
      MG America Appoints Claudio Radossi as President
      Catalent Invests $175M to Expand Mfg. Capabilities at Winchester, KY
      Beauty Packaging

      Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

      Authentic Beauty Concept Launches Second-Generation ‘Refill Bar’
      HASK Beauty Enters Exclusive Partnership with Amazon
      Garance Doré Launches Made in France Skincare Line
      Happi

      Latest Breaking News From Happi

      Silab Implements Biodiversity Conservation Project
      Indie Beauty Brand i-On Skincare Releases New Skin Emulsion, AI Diagnostic Tool
      Estée Lauder Companies' New Research on Oxidative Damage, Skin Barrier Function & Hyperpigmentation
      Ink World

      Latest Breaking News From Ink World

      Nazdar Celebrates 100 Years with a New Look
      hubergroup Chemicals Exhibits at Paint India for First Time
      Award for Sustainability: Evonik Receives Platinum Rating Again
      Label & Narrow Web

      Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

      Specialty announces move to new facility
      Mark Andy hosts dealer's open house in Warsaw
      Nazdar celebrates 100th anniversary with refreshed brand identity
      Nonwovens Industry

      Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

      3M to Expand in Nebraska
      Nicely Offers Nonwoven Slitters, Winders
      'Right' Hygiene Conference to be Held in June
      Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

      FDA Clears Anika Therapeutics' X-Twist Knotless Fixation System
      Paragon 28 Rolls Out TenoTac 2.0 Hammertoe and Soft Tissue Repair
      Cionic Expands Scientific Advisory Board
      Printed Electronics Now

      Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

      Evonik Launches New Processing Aids for PV Wafer Cutting
      NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell
      eMagin Wins People’s Choice Award at Display Week 2022

      Copyright © 2022 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

      AD BLOCKER DETECTED

      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


      FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login